Management strategies to curb rhino poaching: Alternative options using a cost–benefit approach

Authors

  • Sam M. Ferreira 1. Scientific Services, SANParks, Skukuza, South Africa 2. School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
  • Michèle Pfab Applied Biodiversity Research, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa
  • Mike Knight 1. Park Planning & Development, SANParks, Port Elizabeth, South Africa 2. Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20120055

Keywords:

anti-poaching, awareness, CITES, demand–supply, rhino horn trade

Abstract

The combination of increasing demand and high black market prices for rhino horn in Asian markets has fueled an escalation in rhino poaching since 2007, particularly in South Africa. This situation has in turn resulted in greatly increased rhino protection costs, loss in confidence by the private sector in rhinos, loss of revenue to conservation authorities and reduced rhino population growth rates. Within current CITES processes, management responses to threats posed by poaching to rhino persistence fall within a mixture of reactive responses of increased protection and law enforcement and some pro-active responses such as demand reduction tactics, along with a parallel call for opening a legal trade in horn. These rhino management strategies carry different risks and benefits in meeting several conservation objectives. An expert-based risk–benefit analysis of five different rhino management strategies was undertaken to assess their potential for delivering upon agreed rhino conservation objectives. The outcomes indicated that benefits may exceed risks for those strategies that in some or other format legally provided horn for meeting demand. Expert risk–benefit approaches are suggested to offer a rational, inclusive and consensus generating means of addressing complex issues such as rhino poaching and augmenting the information used within the CITES decision-making processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2014-05-29

How to Cite

1.
Ferreira SM, Pfab M, Knight M. Management strategies to curb rhino poaching: Alternative options using a cost–benefit approach. S. Afr. J. Sci. [Internet]. 2014 May 29 [cited 2021 Sep. 21];110(5/6):8. Available from: https://sajs.co.za/article/view/3934