How to interpret core concepts in POPIA? Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research

Donrich Thaldar; Aliki Edgcumbe; Dusty-Lee Donnelly

doi:10.17159/sajs.2023/15062

How to interpret core concepts in POPIA? Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research

Authors

Donrich Thaldar 1.School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 2.Petrie-Flom Center for Health Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7346-3490
Aliki Edgcumbe School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9771-459X
Dusty-Lee Donnelly School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-7481

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/15062

Keywords:

research code of conduct, consent, special personal information, responsible party, de-identification

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

Thaldar, D., Edgcumbe, A., & Donnelly, D.-L. (2023). How to interpret core concepts in POPIA? Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research. South African Journal of Science, 119(7/8). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/15062

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 119 No. 7/8 (2023)

Section

Commentary

License

All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

Copyright is retained by the authors. Readers are welcome to reproduce, share and adapt the content without permission provided the source is attributed.

Disclaimer: The publisher and editors accept no responsibility for statements made by the authors