Comments on ‘The age of fossil StW573 (‘Little Foot’): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data’

Authors

  • Dominic Stratford Department of Archaeology, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Darryl E. Granger Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  • Laurent Bruxelles 1. Department of Archaeology, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 2. French National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research, French Institute of South Africa (IFAS), Johannesburg, South Africa 3. Sub-Saharan Africa (USR 3336), French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Paris, France
  • Ron J. Clarke Evolutionary Studies Institute, School of Geoscience, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Kathleen Kuman 1. Department of Archaeology, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 2. Evolutionary Studies Institute, School of Geoscience, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Ryan J. Gibbon Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/a0213

Keywords:

Australopithecus, Sterkfontein, stratigraphy, depositional age, taphonomy

Published

2017-05-30

Issue

Section

Scientific Correspondence

How to Cite

Stratford, D., Granger, D. E., Bruxelles, L., Clarke, R. J., Kuman, K., & Gibbon, R. J. (2017). Comments on ‘The age of fossil StW573 (‘Little Foot’): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data’. South African Journal of Science, 113(5/6), 3. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/a0213
Views
  • Abstract 940
  • PDF 508
  • EPUB 214
  • XML 233
  • PNG 107

Most read articles by the same author(s)