The Anatomy of a Bad Science: Reflections on Nattrass’ ‘commentary’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8523Keywords:
bad science, prejudice, methodology, quantitative analysis, ontological disconnect, transformationAbstract
This Commentary is a response to a Commentary published in the May/June 2020 issue:
Nattrass N. Why are black South African students less likely to consider studying biological sciences? S Afr J Sci. 2020;116(5/6), Art. #7864, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/7864
Responses to the Commentary in the May/June 2020 issue have been published collectively in a special issue of Volume 116.
Published
2020-07-10
Issue
Section
Commentary
License
All articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
Copyright is retained by the authors. Readers are welcome to reproduce, share and adapt the content without permission provided the source is attributed.
Disclaimer: The publisher and editors accept no responsibility for statements made by the authors
How to Cite
Adesina, J. O. (2020). The Anatomy of a Bad Science: Reflections on Nattrass’ ‘commentary’. South African Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8523
Views
- Abstract 1115
- PDF 809
- XML 337
.png){kind=spacer}