Physicochemical characteristics of Bambara groundnut dietary fibres extracted using wet milling

Authors

  • Yvonne Maphosa Department of Food Technology, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Victoria. A. Jideani Department of Food Technology, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150126

Keywords:

swelling capacity, bulk density, water holding capacity, soluble dietary fibre, insoluble dietary fibre

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to extract soluble and insoluble dietary fibres from four Bambara groundnut (BGN) varieties (black-eye, brown-eye, brown and red) using the wet milling method and evaluate their physicochemical properties. The swelling capacities of brown-eye (6.5 g/mL) and black-eye (6.2 g/mL) fibres were higher (p≤0.05) than those of red (6.0 g/mL) and brown (5.5 g/mL) fibres while the water holding capacities of black-eye and brown-eye fibres (2.84 g and 2.83 g water/g sample) were higher (p≤0.05) than those of brown and red fibres. The bulk densities of insoluble dietary fibres (IDFs) and soluble dietary fibres (SDFs) ranged between 0.57 g/mL (red) to 0.67 g/mL (brown-eye) and 0.46 g/mL (brown-eye) to 0.57 g/mL (black-eye), respectively. The oil binding capacities (OBCs) of SDFs ranged between 2.78 g oil/g sample (brown) and 4.03 g oil/g sample (brown-eye) while the OBC of all IDFs did not differ (p>0.05), ranging between 1.52 g oil/g sample (brown) and 1.40 g oil/g sample (brown-eye and black-eye). Black-eye and brown-eye dietary fibres had higher phenolic and total sugar content. The findings of this study indicate the potential of BGN fibres in food systems as fat replacers, emulsion stabilisers, water binders, bulking agents, thickeners and nutritional additives.

Published

2016-02-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Maphosa, Y., & Jideani, V. A. (2016). Physicochemical characteristics of Bambara groundnut dietary fibres extracted using wet milling. South African Journal of Science, 112(1/2), 8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150126
Views
  • Abstract 781
  • PDF 664
  • EPUB 175
  • XML 195