‘I don’t want to go back to the farm’: A case study of Working for Water beneficiaries

Authors

  • Jan A. Hough DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology and Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • Heidi E. Prozesky DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology and Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2013/1119

Keywords:

Working for Water, invasive alien species, farm labour, landowner

Abstract

In addition to clearing invasive alien plants, the Working for Water (WfW) Programme, as a South African government public works programme, provides short-term employment and training to empower the poor in finding alternative employment within the labour market. Several studies indicate that its beneficiaries become financially dependent on WfW projects and tend to be reluctant to leave the programme. The sociological reasons for this reluctance, however, remain largely unstudied. We therefore address this gap by reporting on a case study of four WfW projects in the Western Cape Province. Face-to-face interviews with beneficiaries suggest that a number of push and pull factors contribute to their dependency on WfW. Chief among these factors is a fear among previous farmworkers of returning to farm work. It was found that the latter can be linked to a historical power-relations legacy between landowners and farmworkers, mainly created by institutional racism still prevailing on many Western Cape farms. These findings bear important implications for the implementation of a new draft WfW policy aimed at encouraging private landowners to employ WfW beneficiaries on their land as clearers of invasive alien plants.

Published

2013-09-20

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Hough, J. A., & Prozesky, H. E. (2013). ‘I don’t want to go back to the farm’: A case study of Working for Water beneficiaries. South African Journal of Science, 109(9/10), 8. https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2013/1119
Views
  • Abstract 343
  • PDF 354
  • EPUB 172
  • XML 190